Grokipedia, xAI'sAI-powered online encyclopaedia, . Version 0.1 features an extremely basic white-text-on-a-black-background look and stripped back page layouts, plus more than 885,000 articles.
But despite that Grokipedia "will be a massive improvement over Wikipedia," much of the content seems to have come directly from it (via ). In addition to a number of pages seemingly copied across verbatim, you'll also see a disclaimer that reads, "The content is adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License" at the bottom of many Grokipedia articles.
In a statement to The Verge, Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson Lauren Dickinson commented, "Wikipedia’s knowledge is–and always will be–human. Through open collaboration and consensus, people from all backgrounds build a neutral, living record of human understanding–one that reflects our diversity and collective curiosity. This human-created knowledge is what AI companies rely on to generate content; even Grokipedia needs Wikipedia to exist."
To be fair to Grokipedia, this isn't really the highest quality source for Wikipedia to be citing either. When almost anyone can contribute to an online encyclopedia, not all contributions are created equal, after all. However, the Wikipedia article doesn't contextualise the claim with a specific timeframe outside of the citation footnote. So, why Grokipedia then anchors the statement with 'as of 2024,' [[link]] I can't say—that's a fresh mistake that's all Grokipedia's own as far as I can see.
Multiple lengthy paragraphs short: Grokipedia looks to be copying Wikipedia's homework—but badly. Worse still, the claim at the top of the page that Grok 'fact-checked' three days ago does not exactly fill me with confidence either.
As [[link]] you may already be aware, Large Language Model based AIs sometimes have a tenuous grasp of factual information and . To put it much less generously, a lot of text-based AI will readily make stuff up because it's only trying to guess which word is most likely to come next and it doesn't actually understand what it's saying. Sometimes this results in , and sometimes it will take the form of when you search your name.
As for Grok itself, there was also the whole back in July. Musk claimed shortly after that these concerning responses from Grok had since been addressed. Still, I'm left to wonder what sort of oversight Grokipedia enjoys? Has xAI deployed a team of editors to make sure Grok doesn't go rogue again? Is Grokipedia even attempting to approach the subject matter of its 885,000 articles from a neutral point of view? claims not—and for that reason, I'll continue to take my chances with Wikipedia and its fleet of volunteer editors instead.
1. Best overall:
2. Best budget:
3. Best high-end:
4. Best compact:
5. Alienware:
6. Best mini PC:
👉👈
HighRoller2960
The progressive jackpots are thrilling, and it's exciting to watch the jackpot amounts grow as more players spin the reels. I hope they add even more jackpot slots because it adds a lot of excitement to the gameplay. The mobile interface is smooth and intuitive. I can play all my favorite slots on the go without experiencing any lag or glitches. The design is responsive and user-friendly, which makes gaming on my phone just as enjoyable as on my computer. Sometimes I wish there were more ways to earn rewards through loyalty programs or frequent player bonuses. Adding seasonal events or special challenges could enhance the excitement even further.